blog
IP2Innovate

Opvolging toezegging over inbreukverboden en proportionaliteit in het octrooirecht

BRIEF VAN DE MINISTER VAN ECONOMISCHE ZAKEN EN KLIMAAT

Aan de Voorzitter van de Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal - Den Haag, 20 juni 2022

Concreet hebben de leden van het CDA gevraagd hoe ik sta tegenover het opnemen van een proportionaliteitstoets in de Rijksoctrooiwet 1995. Ik zie hiervoor op dit moment geen aanleiding. Belangrijkste reden hiervoor is dat Nederlandse rechters nu al een afweging kunnen maken of een inbreukverbod proportioneel is en dat in de praktijk ook doen. Het bestaande wettelijk kader biedt hiervoor de nodige flexibiliteit. Het biedt de Nederlandse rechter onder meer de ruimte om invulling te geven aan de jurisprudentie van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie. Ook zijn er geen indicaties dat er sprake is van een ongelijk speelveld met Duitsland en België. Het Eengemaakt Octrooigerecht, dat naar verwachting spoedig van start zal gaan, kan in de nabije toekomst bovendien gaan bijdragen aan verdere uniformering van het octrooiprocesrecht. Het bestaande kader van de Rijksoctrooiwet 1995 biedt de Nederlandse rechter de nodige ruimte ook daarop in te kunnen spelen.

 

Share

Other blogs

IP2Innovate

New academic paper calls for targeted reforms of the IP rights enforcement directive to boost European competitiveness

A new academic paper titled Realizing the potential of proportionality in patent enforcement A case for amending IPRED by professor Rafal Sikorski from Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland makes a convincing case for making targeted amendments to the IP rights enforcement directive (IPRED). IP2Innovate spoke to him and asked why IPRED reform is so important for European competitiveness? Here’s what he said: “We are aware that patent enforcement, especially injunctive relief, can be leveraged by patent holders to obtain excessive royalties. Users innovate with their products but find there may be a patent in a small part of the product, one that may even have come from a component supplied by a third party. This is frequently the case with complex tech products. Clearing up these patent issues is both time consuming and costly and in some cases – that is when patent applications have just been filed by patent holders but not yet published – simply impossible”. Professor Sikorski said. “This impacts competitiveness because it can result in products being removed from the market. The injunction creates a barrier to entry and that stifles competition It deprives the market of competition, and it denies consumers the ability to buy these products. “Products have been barred from sale in Europe due to patent disputes. It has happened in the mobile phone sector, laptops, cars. Even a temporary injunction has a very negative effect on a firm’s business. “Mario Draghi’s report on how to restore European competitiveness has been interpreted by some patent owners as a call for strengthening patent enforcement. However, I would argue that Europe must have a more flexible system. Ensuring healthy innovation and competitiveness requires more than just rigid enforcement. It also needs flexibility to address concerns in individual cases.”
IP2Innovate

Structural weakness in Europe’s patent system should also be a Presidency priority

The Portuguese Presidency of the EU is hosting a high-level conference tomorrow focused on intellectual property in the digital world, and the importance of an innovation-oriented ecosystem to improve the quality of life for citizens and companies, and drive economic recovery.
Patrick Oliver

SMEs – the unseen victims of patent trolling

As the European Commission turns its attention to helping improve the regulatory environment for SMEs here is a true story about how patent trolls broke the back of a successful small European business.
Back to overview

Subscribe to our newsletter

Privacy policy

© IP2Innovate 2025 - Website door Two Impress