blog
IP2Innovate

Committee of Economic Affairs and Climate policy, Committee debate on Innovation

VERSLAG VAN EEN COMMISSIEDEBAT - Vastgesteld 15 juni 2022

De vaste commissie voor Economische Zaken en Klimaat heeft op 25 mei 2022 overleg gevoerd met mevrouw Adriaansens, Minister van Economische Zaken en Klimaat. De heer Amhaouch (CDA) stelde daar twee vragen over octrooien, IP’s en patenten: "Voorzitter, ik heb nog twee concrete punten over octrooien, IP’s en patenten. Nederland is daar heel sterk in. Maar om een gelijk speelveld in Europa te hebben, moeten we aansluiten bij onze Belgische en Duitse buren. Wij ontvangen signalen dat in België en Duitsland heel anders wordt omgegaan met de proportionaliteitstoets om te kijken of een IP of een octrooi helemaal afgeschermd kan worden. Nederland schiet daarin door: op alles wordt gezegd dat het een inbreuk is. Wij vragen de Minister om de proportionaliteitstoets die door de Europese wetgeving is voorgeschreven, op te nemen in de Rijksoctrooiwet. Dit is niet alleen belangrijk voor een gelijk speelveld met onze Duitse en Belgische buren, maar ook om onze grote maatschappelijke opgave mogelijk te maken. 

Share

Other blogs

IP2Innovate

IP2Innovate's submission on the upcoming European Innovation Act

IP2Innovate has responded to the Commission's call for evidence on the upcoming European Innovation Act, highlighting that proportionality in patent remedies across the EU is needed to support the European Innovation Act’s goals of creating innovation-friendly regulation and eliminating Single Market fragmentation. IP2Innovate welcomes the objectives of the upcoming European Innovation Act. A balanced patent system is an important prerequisite to ensure Europe’s global competitiveness in critical technology areas, its attractiveness for companies to invest and do business in, and to increase innovation and the take up of new technologies necessary to bridge the gap in productivity levels when compared to other major economies. Unfortunately, our member companies' experiences, supported by data, indicate that Europe's patent system currently lacks the necessary balance, undermining investment in innovation to the detriment of both the public and Europe’s competitiveness. The current practice by EU courts of granting automatic injunctions in patent infringement cases contradicts the European Innovation Act’s goals of creating innovation-friendly regulation and eliminating Single Market fragmentation. The solution is to modernize the 20-year-old IPR Enforcement Directive to align with Innovation Act objectives and to help close the innovation gap between Europe and its global competitors. Read our submission here: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14593-European-Innovation-Act/F33069711_en
IP2Innovate

IP2I Recommendations for Improvements to the Public Availability of Information on Proceedings before the UPC

IP2I appreciates the improvements made to date to improve the availability of information on proceedings before the Unified Patent Court. To achieve its full potential for transparency and permit a better understanding of legal developments and trends, IP2I recommends that continued improvements focus on providing more robust searchability for information, and reducing the delay associated with making information available to the public.
Patrick Oliver

Patent abuse hurts European SMEs and undermines the knowledge transfer process

This year World Intellectual Property Day focuses on SMEs. As the two examples below show, patents can be an SME’s worst enemy, as well as their best friend. Abuse by patent assertion entities is a serious and growing threat in Europe, especially to small and mid-size innovative firms. The gaming of the European patent system must stop.
Back to overview

Subscribe to our newsletter

Privacy policy

© IP2Innovate 2025 - Website door Two Impress