Contact
blog
IP2Innovate

Committee of Economic Affairs and Climate policy, Committee debate on Innovation

VERSLAG VAN EEN COMMISSIEDEBAT - Vastgesteld 15 juni 2022

De vaste commissie voor Economische Zaken en Klimaat heeft op 25 mei 2022 overleg gevoerd met mevrouw Adriaansens, Minister van Economische Zaken en Klimaat. De heer Amhaouch (CDA) stelde daar twee vragen over octrooien, IP’s en patenten: "Voorzitter, ik heb nog twee concrete punten over octrooien, IP’s en patenten. Nederland is daar heel sterk in. Maar om een gelijk speelveld in Europa te hebben, moeten we aansluiten bij onze Belgische en Duitse buren. Wij ontvangen signalen dat in België en Duitsland heel anders wordt omgegaan met de proportionaliteitstoets om te kijken of een IP of een octrooi helemaal afgeschermd kan worden. Nederland schiet daarin door: op alles wordt gezegd dat het een inbreuk is. Wij vragen de Minister om de proportionaliteitstoets die door de Europese wetgeving is voorgeschreven, op te nemen in de Rijksoctrooiwet. Dit is niet alleen belangrijk voor een gelijk speelveld met onze Duitse en Belgische buren, maar ook om onze grote maatschappelijke opgave mogelijk te maken. 

Read full Committee debate here
Share

Other blogs

IP2Innovate

IP2I calls on European Commission to protect Europe’s patent system from abuse

A new academic study by economists at the universities of Bordeaux, Grenoble, and Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) highlights how patent assertion entities (PAEs) are continuing to take advantage of weaknesses in Europe’s patent system. The study, entitled Patent Privateering, looks at one specific method of patent abuse. Patent privateering is a term to describe a situation where a patent owner hands patents to a patent assertion entity (PAE) to exploit for mutual benefit, allowing the patent owner to maintain a secret stake in the patents. The study concluded that patent privateering is widespread in Europe. The practise has been around for many years but as other jurisdictions including the US have made it harder, Europe’s patent system is a ripe target for abuse. This is largely because patent courts in Europe do not apply the principle of proportionality, and instead hand out injunctions to patent owners almost automatically.
IP2Innovate

IP2I Recommendations for Improvements to the Public Availability of Information on Proceedings before the UPC

IP2I appreciates the improvements made to date to improve the availability of information on proceedings before the Unified Patent Court. To achieve its full potential for transparency and permit a better understanding of legal developments and trends, IP2I recommends that continued improvements focus on providing more robust searchability for information, and reducing the delay associated with making information available to the public.
IP2Innovate

Prof. Sikorski’s latest paper: IPRED needs targeted reforms to strengthen the principle of proportionality in patent litigation

There is broad agreement on the need for taking proportionality considerations into account in patent litigation cases but it’s not being applied in the courts in Europe. As a result, injunctions are being handed out automatically in almost all cases, even though EU legislation – the IP Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED) – specifically calls for judges to apply proportionality. IPRED needs targeted amendments in order to correct this. In his paper titled Permanent Injunctions and the Reception of the Principle of Proportionality in the European Union, Rafal Sikorski, assistant professor, Chair of European Law at the Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznan in Poland, calls for reform of the directive. “The EU should consider introducing a set of factors to IPRED that the courts should consider when applying proportionality. In fact, this approach has already been taken by the EU legislator in the Trade Secrets Directive,” Professor Sikorski said in an interview.
 Back to overview

Subscribe to our newsletter

Privacy policy

© IP2Innovate 2025 - Website door Two Impress