blog
IP2Innovate

IP2I's statement on the European Commission publication of the follow-up study on the application of the Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRED)

BRUSSELS, 27 January 2026 - IP2I's statement on the European Commission publication of the follow-up study on the application of the Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRED)

IP2I welcomes the publication of the independent study into the effectiveness of certain provisions of the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED).

The study confirms what our members have been experiencing for years and continue to experience: the proportionality requirement set out in the IPRED is not applied to patent cases in Europe, and is particularly problematic in Germany. Courts are granting automatic permanent injunctions in nearly all patent infringement cases without assessing whether the remedy fits the circumstances.

The lack of application of proportionality to patent enforcement undermines Europe's ability to attract investment in innovative technologies. This directly affects our competitiveness.

The study outlines several ways to solve this urgent problem so as to simplify the regulatory environment for companies and support their competitiveness. IP2I believes modernising the 20-year-old IPRED through targeted legislative amendments is the right and most effective solution. Non-binding guidelines have proven ineffective in addressing this issue, as evidenced by the Commission's November 2017 IPRED guidance, which failed to improve the situation - a failure the study also acknowledges.

 

For further information, please contact:
Patrick Oliver, Executive Director, IP2Innovate
contact@ip2innovate.eu
+32 477 597065

Share

Other press releases

IP2Innovate welcomes the call by CDU/CSU to introduce a proportionality test in the German Patent Act to better protect innovators against patent trolls

In a recent  the German Conservatives (CDU/CSU) Elisabeth Winkelmeier-Becker and Ingmar Jung express concerns over abusive litigation practices by patent trolls, which distort the market and undermine Germany’s attractiveness as a business location. They note that in light of the high complexity of modern products, companies can no longer completely rule out the possibility of patent infringements. In this context, an unlimited right to injunctive relief create unwarranted leverage for patent trolls who buy up patents only to assert them against companies and extract disproportionately high settlements. Solutions proposed by CDU/CSU are the introduction of a proportionality test in the German Patent Act as well as a synchronisation of infringement and nullity proceedings.
Managing IP

NPEs set sights on UPC and more patent acquisition - Blackbird, Dominion Harbor, Acacia, and Harfang IP say the market is hot for patent acquisitions and that litigation opportunities could soon emerge in Europe

Managing IP’s article outlining the views of Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) on the Unified Patent Court (UPC) points out that several NPEs are gearing up for the launch of the UPC in the following months because the UPC’s centralised system “would make Europe a much easier place to litigate”. NPEs also argue that UPC would provide for another way to litigate in a “market comparable to China or the US”.
lessentiel.lu

L’Europe menacée par les «chasseurs de brevets»?

Patent trolls irritates European companies who fear that these companies will develop under new Community rules.
Back to overview

Subscribe to our newsletter

Privacy policy

© IP2Innovate 2025 - Website door Two Impress