Contrary to EU law, courts across Europe consistently fail to consider proportionality in patent cases, new data reveals

IP2Innovate calls on the European Commission to promote similar reforms to those recently enacted in Germany in all EU member states


BRUSSELS, 25 November 2021 – Between 2018 and 2020, courts in nine EU member states plus the UK and Norway, handed out injunctions automatically in 98% of patent cases in which an infringement was found, according to data sourced from Darts-ip, a Clarivate IP intelligence solution.


Of the 224 court decisions examined, where an infringement was found and a permanent injunction requested, only four – or 2% – saw a proportionality assessment. The data shows that permanent injunctions are overwhelmingly granted by courts around Europe without any consideration of proportionality as is required by EU law.


The findings follow a landmark vote in Germany in June to move Europe’s busiest national patent jurisdiction away from automatic injunctions. The reformed German patent law calls on courts to make a proportionality assessment, and to consider the interests of third parties when doing so.

Automatic injunctions result in an imbalanced patent system which deters productive      firms and allows unscrupulous patent holders to extract disproportionately high settlements based on the threat of harm that would result from an injunction halting production and sales, rather than the value contributed by the patent.


The principle of proportionality is enshrined in all EU laws.  In the case of patents, proportionality protects against unreasonable demands from patent owners and requires that any remedy be aligned with the value contributed by the patent.


The issuance of an injunction without consideration of proportionality is a particularly powerful weapon when wielded by Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) who do not make any product and simply seek monetary settlements. PAEs can use the threat of an automatic injunction and the damage that would result to seek settlements far greater than the value contributed by the invention or any actual harm resulting from the infringement.


“It is clear that automatic injunctions in patent infringement cases are the norm in patent courts across the European continent,” said Patrick Oliver, executive director of IP2Innovate, a trade group pushing for balance in Europe’s patent systems.


The data reveals that in France, Italy and the Netherlands – after Germany, three of the largest patent jurisdictions in Europe – there were no proportionality assessments carried out at all during the period under review.


“These countries, and many more, are consistently failing to apply an important principle of EU patent law that requires that remedies be proportionate,” Mr Oliver said, adding: “Now that Germany is adjusting its system it’s time the European Commission took action to encourage others to follow suit.”


This action could take the form of a set of guidelines to help member states correctly interpret EU laws, and in particular the Intellectual Property Rights Enforcement Directive (IPRED from 2004).


“We will of course be raising the issue in the member states highlighted in the study too,” Mr Oliver added.


Media contact:

Paul Meller

+32 497 322 966


Other press releases

Patrick Oliver

Wide cross-section of industry urges the European Commission to take action to stop PAEs from gaming the patent system in Europe

Thirty-five companies and four industry groups representing over 150 companies from different industry sectors, have written to European Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, urging him to take action to clamp down on Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) – otherwise known as “patent trolls”. “The experience of our member companies indicates that Europe’s patent system is not working properly and is undermining Europe’s ability to compete globally in the next frontier of technologies,” said Patrick Oliver, Executive Director of IP2Innovate, one of the industry groups that signed the letter. “The European Commission needs to take steps to stop PAEs from gaming the patent system. We are urging Commissioner Breton to draft a set of guidelines that address imbalances in the patent system – in particular guidelines that support the application of a proportionality requirement in patent enforcement by judges around Europe, as required by EU law,” Mr Oliver added. Many European courts issue automatic injunctions upon a finding of a patent infringement, without considering a remedy that could be more proportionate. So for example, an unintentional infringement of just one patent among many others could result in a popular product being withdrawn from the market. PAEs don’t invent, build or sell anything. They just buy up patents to assert them against innovative companies, including SMEs, and extract high settlement fees not based on the value of the underlying invention but rather based on the damage that would result from the removal of the entire product from the market. “As litigation by PAEs has slowed in the US we have witnessed its rise in Europe,” Mr Oliver said, adding: “It’s not just big firms that are targeted – SMEs are also picked on by PAEs. Unjustified product withdrawals can sink a company. They also deprive the public of consumer choice and the benefits of innovation.” Clear enforcement guidelines would help ensure Member States apply EU law properly. They would also bring more balance to the patent system and help avoid disproportionate outcomes and abusive litigation practices, Mr Oliver said. “We stand ready to work with the Commissioner and his team on specific solutions to prevent PAEs from further exploiting the legal system to the detriment of Europe’s digital economy,” he said. Notes to editors: 1. The letter to Commissioner Breton and full list of signatories can be found here. 2. IP2Innovate (IP2I) is a coalition of small and large companies that create innovative products and services in Europe and collectively hold thousands of European patents, as well as European industry groups that collectively represent 65 companies. Our members include: Adidas, Amadeus, Atos / Bull, Daimler, Dell, Freebox, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Nvidia, Proximus, SAP, Spotify & Wiko. IP2I is concerned about a number of imbalances in Europe’s patent legal system that are being exploited to the detriment of innovation and growth in Europe. The exploitation of these imbalances is in particular shown by the rise of litigation related activity by Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) in Europe. 3. European Commission’s IP Package of 29 November 2017: In its IP Package of 29 November 2017, the Commission acknowledged that there are differences in the way Member States apply certain provisions of the EU Directive on IPR enforcement (IPRED) (such as those on injunctions) across the Single Market, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the Directive. The Commission therefore undertook to “work with Member States' national experts and judges on further, more targeted guidelines, to give more detailed and practical guidance on specific IPRED issues, based on best practices experience” (here, p. 29) with a view to improving the system of judicial enforcement in the EU. Two years after the publication of the IP Package, the thirty-four companies and four associations signatories to the letter to Commissioner Breton call on the European Commission to expand its work with Member States, judges and stakeholders to publish targeted guidelines to support the homogenous and effective application of the proportionality principle to patents. 4. For further information, please contact: Patrick Oliver Executive Director, IP2Innovate Email: Mobile: +32-477-597065

IP2Innovate statement on the European Commission’s plans to propose a new regulation governing SEP licensing

BRUSSELS, 5 April 2023 – According to news reports last week the European Commission’s planned proposal for a Regulation on standard essential patents (SEPs) will tackle deep-rooted problems such as the lack of transparency and predictability in SEP licensing. IP2Innovate looks forward to reading the official proposal in the coming weeks.
Patrick Oliver

New report: Europe faces a growing problem of firms abusing the patent system for financial gain

A  published today gives unique insight into how some non-practising entities (NPEs), also known as patent asserting entities (PAEs) or patent trolls, game Europe’s patent system. The report also provides further evidence that the problem of patent trolls is migrating to Europe from the US, and it proposes several policy responses to address the problem.
Back to overview

Subscribe to our newsletter

Privacy policy
© IP2Innovate 2020